All front-line health care workers deserve pandemic pay

As you know, the Ontario government announced a Pandemic Pay top-up of $4.00 an hour until August 12.

CUPE and OCHU have been lobbying hard at the Ministry of Health and Treasury Board and have expanded the list of facilities covered to all hospitals and all of long term care.

 

CUPE and OCHU have been lobbying the government also to expand the list of classifications covered to include clerical and administrative/maintenance/labs/pharmacy/stores/mdrd and others.

We have yet to see an updated list of classifications covered, we expect that to be released in the next few days.

 

Send a message to Premier Ford, and Hon. Ministers Christine Elliott and Peter Bethlenfalvy to show you support front-line health care workers.

https://ochu.on.ca/2020/04/30/pandemic-pay/

 

Membership TOWNHALL – Call In

CUPE Local 1623

Membership TOWNHALL – Call In

Date:                        April 30, 2020

Time:                       17h55

                                 English    Dial-in Number: 1 (877) 229-8493  PIN: 114235#

                                 French Dial-in Number: 1 (877) 255-5810   PIN:  114915#

                                 Subject:                Update members on recent developments including the provincial wage subsidy.

 

 

We hope you join us.

As outbreaks in Ontario LTC homes continue why are residents not being taken to hospital for higher care?

 

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                 MEDIA RELEASE                  APRIL 21, 2020

 

As outbreaks in Ontario long-term care homes continue

why are residents not being taken to hospital for higher care?

 

TORONTO, ON – As thousands of hospital staff from many different occupations selflessly volunteer to work in long-term care (LTC) homes afflicted with COVID-19 outbreaks, the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) is asking whether the decision not to transfer residents to hospital is sound.

 

In other jurisdictions, which are far more successful at containing COVID-19, long-term care residents are removed to a facility (like a hospital) where they can receive a higher level of care. This ‘isolation’ of residents who have COVID-19, protects those other residents who do not yet have the virus within the home – but are, because of their age or frail condition, at higher risk of infection. Ontario long-term care homes have not been able to apply normal social distancing – in the bedrooms, the shared toilets, the hallways where residents may wander, and the dining rooms. Removing COVID-19 patients from the long-term care homes will make this more possible.

 

Also, in other countries high testing rates of health care staff, residents and patients is key to containing the spread of COVID-19.

 

CUPE is asking the Ontario government to rethink some of its recent decisions and move residents with COVID-19 to hospital and to test more of the workforce and patient and resident populations in hospitals and long-term care. Most hospitals in Ontario currently have the capacity to handle these transfers.

 

“If the evidence is that you remove vulnerable residents with COVID-19 to centres and hospitals specifically set up for that purpose and engage in massive testing, why is the Ontario government going in the other direction? asks Michael Hurley president of CUPE’s Ontario Council of Hospital Unions (OCHU/CUPE). “The courage, compassion, expertise and altruism of the volunteers is very inspiring. But wouldn’t a more effective policy be to move COVID-19 residents out of their long-term care facility to hospital?”

 

As of midday Monday, 114 LTC homes were in outbreak, with 1,965 residents, staff, and others infected.  Media reports that the Ontario government is under-reporting outbreaks in long-term care by as much as 40 per cent. Infected residents in long-term care are 47 per cent more likely to die than community COVID-19 cases.

 

Whatever is happening in the community, infection rates in long-term care are not peaking yet. “Sadly, there are many residents dying,” says CUPE Ontario secretary-treasurer Candace Rennick who is critical of the provincial government’s policy that redeploys hospital staff to long-term care.

 

“This is flawed, because while staff in long-term care are restricted to working at only one facility, hospital staff can return to their hospital, as long as they are asymptomatic”, says Rennick. “Given that these staff are being sent into long-term care facilities which are in outbreak, there is a risk that some staff will be allowed to return to their hospital position without undergoing testing or isolation.

Letter to Premier Ford – April 15, 2020

 

Dear sisters and brothers,

CUPE, SEIU, Unifor, and OPSEU have written to the Premier asking for the Ontario government to pay for part-time for their sick leave and due to COVID-19, to pay part-time and full-time for isolation and quarantine for COVID-19 and to make whole losses incurred by any health care worker as a result of the one site policy in effect in long term care.

English: Letter to Premier Ford – April 15, 2020

 

Revised Directive #5 (PPE)

Following membership actions around access to PPE, and through joint efforts with other unions in the health care sector, the previous directive negotiated by ONA has been expanded to include other staff in hospitals, and to include LTC (both nursing homes and retirement homes).

Please review the directive in detail as there are a few pieces to draw your attention to:

 

  • The first paragraph (above the first bullet) in the Required Precautions and Procedures section defines important terms contained within the scope of the directive:
    • “health care worker” refers to a regulated health professional as defined under the Regulated Health Professionals Act;
    • “other employees” refers to other employees employed by or in public hospitals and long term care homes – for our purposes this would cover PSWs, housekeeping, dietary, etc…
  • Only “health care workers,” as defined above, are able to perform the point-of-care risk assessment (PCRA);
  • If a PCRA has been performed, and it has been determined that N95s are required, we are in a very strong position to insist that those cannot be unreasonably denied;
  • We can point to this directive to also assert that anyone working within 2 metres of a suspected, or confirmed, COVID resident should be provided appropriate PPE, including an N95;
  • If there is a possible shortage of PPE that the Employer must consult with the union on contingency plans (3rd bullet). We are also supposed to engage on the conservation and stewardship of PPE (1st bullet). Those two bullets can be combined to make a very compelling case for employers to engage pro-actively in open discussion around PPE supply, but at minimum there is a clear requirement to consult in the event of a possible shortage.
  • Please keep the working group informed of examples where staff have requested an N95 and have been refused so that we can assess and advise on next steps, including work refusals and complaints to the MOL.

English: CMOH Directive 5 Revised 2020-04-10